• No categories
Site Tools

Which Of The Following Was An Outcome Of The North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta)

NaFTA`s rules of origin for textiles and clothing define when imported textile or clothing products qualify for preferential treatment. Most products are subject to the “forward yarn” rule of origin, which means that the products must be made from yarn manufactured in a NAFTA country to receive preferential treatment. Beginning in the 1960s, Mexico had a restrictive policy of import substitution through a series of Mexican automobile decrees in which the government sought to supply the entire Mexican market with locally produced automotive products. Orders in Council: NAFTA was the largest free trade agreement in the world when it was established on January 1, 1994. NAFTA was the first time two developed countries signed a trade agreement with an emerging market. The labour and environment treaties included language to promote labour and environmental cooperation, as well as provisions to address a party`s inability to enforce its own labour and environmental laws. Parallel dispute settlement procedures, which can impose monetary valuations and sanctions as a last resort to address a party`s failure to enforce its laws, have perhaps been the most remarkable. For many, it was an opportunity to work within cross-border on environmental and labour issues and to establish a new type of relationship between NAFTA partners.36 Under Article II of the Constitution, the president has the power to negotiate with foreign countries. If President Trump decides to renegotiate NAFTA, transposing the renegotiated agreement into domestic law would likely take one of two forms, depending on the subject of the negotiations: presidential proclamation85 or, if renegotiations are likely to result in changes in the United States. The president would likely seek expedited processing of the implementation of the legislation under the Comprehensive Bipartisan Trade Promotion and Accountability Act of 2015 (TPA).86 NAFTA`s investment provisions include exceptions in Mexico`s energy sector where the Mexican government has reserved the right to prohibit foreign investment. The United States could seek to improve access to Mexico`s oil sector or improve bilateral cooperation on energy production and security. For Canada, the CFTA and NAFTA energy chapters contain a “proportionality provision.” This provision provides that a domestic restriction on Canadian energy exports cannot reduce the share of exports delivered to the United States. The chapter also prohibits price discrimination between domestic consumption and exports to the United States.

Some Canadians argue that this provision limits Canada`s ability to make energy policy decisions and may seek to amend this provision. The United States, Canada and Mexico could try to negotiate new rules of origin to account for modern developments in the manufacture of automobiles and auto parts, or to encourage greater production in the North American auto industry by increasing rules of origin. NAFTA phased out Mexico`s restrictive auto executive order and opened up Mexico`s auto sector to foreign investment from the United States. He liberalized the North American auto trade and was instrumental in the integration of the North American auto industry. NAFTA has phased out all U.S. tariffs on auto imports from Mexico and Mexican tariffs on U.S. and Canadian products, as long as they meet the 62.5% Dess rules of origin for cars, light commercial vehicles, engines and transmissions; and 60% for all other vehicles and auto parts. .