Categories
  • No categories
Site Tools

What Is The Position Of Agreement With A Minor

You can sign a contract with whomever you want. And most contracts work well without the need for a cure. But if something happens and a party violates (violates) the contract, only a valid contract can be taken to court and decided (negotiated). Advantageous contracts: A minor can be a beneficiary or promise. In other words, if a contract is advantageous for a minor, it can be performed by him. In Raghava Shariar vs Srinivasa, A mortgaged B (a minor) who had a certain amount of money in A. The court ruled in this case that the mortgage is enforceable for minors because the transaction was to its advantage. A minor is a person who has not yet reached the age of majority as defined in the preceding paragraphs. § 11 declares a minor contractually capable, a contract with or by a minor is void and unenforceable. This fact is accepted in many legal decisions. The case of Ram vs. Shyam is a better example of the issue.

In this case, a miner pawns his house in favor of a lender to get a loan of 20,000 rupees and has received 8,000 rupees from the mortgage. The holder of the mortgage has filed a lawsuit for the recovery of the money from his mortgage and for the sale of real estate in the event of default. The Privy Council ruled that an agreement by a minor was absolutely void against him and that, therefore, the hypothecary creditor could not recover the money from the mortgage. Under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, jurisdiction is a prerequisite for each party before entering into an agreement. Section 11 of the Contracts Act states: “Any person who is of legal age under the law to which he is subject is of good spirit and is not disqualified by the law to which he is subject is qualified to contract.” Thus, in the section, the following persons who are not able to enter into a contract are claimed-1) Minors2) Persons with an unhealthy mind3) Legally disqualified personsA minors` right and contract law do not go hand in hand and the majority is a prerequisite for a valid contract. A minor cannot terminate a contract for something necessary for life, and a contract with a minor for necessary items cannot be declared invalid. The problem is to determine what is really needed. Examples of necessities would be food, clothing and shelter. In one example, a minor took out a mortgage on a house and then tried to get out of it. The court ruled that the house was necessary.

Transportation to work to pay the cost of living can also be considered a necessary element. a court should find out. Under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, a person who has reached the age of majority would be able to contract. The age of majority was specified in section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, i.e. a person would reach the age of majority if he had completed eighteen years. But earlier in England, the age of majority was earlier twenty-one. Today, under the Family Law Reform Act 1969, a minor is a person under the age of eighteen. Previously, the minor was called an “infant”; but this law changed the term to “minor”. Mohori Bibi`s landmark decision stated that a minor`s agreement is absolutely null, in England, the Infant`s Relief Act 1874 also declares the following categories of a minor`s agreement absolutely null and void if: Under section 26 of the Act, a minor may sign, plead and negotiate and he or she may bind anyone other than himself….